epg

emotional process geometry

we tend to treat emotions as things. but when we want to understand them better, what we're usually concerned with has less to do with what they are and more to do with how they behave. and they don't behave like things. they aren't discrete objects with a clear form, and they can't be reduced to the categories and labels we assign them. they rarely operate in simple binaries like feeling/unfeeling, good/bad, like/dislike, or happy/sad. instead, they seem to resist fixed definition, as if they exist in gradations along a continuum that is always in motion and always changing.

consider how we talk about them: emotions rise and settle, spread or stick, loop or pass. they can be held inside, or expressed and released. this is the language of motion, dynamics, and change. it describes something less like a solid object we hold and more like a fluid that moves through us.

top: a single line moving in real time. each point along it represents a different part of what's being felt. the number in the corner is the line's average level, recalculated as it moves.

bottom: the same line recorded over time. the newest moment is at the top and older moments move downward. darker areas mean more intensity, so rises leave streaks and the area that holds shows as a steady band.

one way to picture this continuum is as a river, constantly flowing and changing. like a river, our feelings shift from moment to moment. at times there's turbulence; at other times, a peaceful, steady stream. some days the river is large and powerful, and other days it's just a trickle. seeing emotion this way brings dynamics and forces into view, and from them, structure and even patterned movement begin to emerge. my thinking in developing this project has been that if we could describe these dynamics and forces accurately, maybe we could build a model of that movement that's both intuitive and visual enough to reveal the many unseen connections between the different pieces involved in how feeling moves.

any model like this is only a map. it isn't what emotion actually "looks like," and like any attempt to capture a dynamic process, it has real limits. it's still only a sample of something larger, but it might offer a wider lens. if you reach into a river, pull out a handful of water, and say "this is the river," you're partly right, but it isn't the whole story. words and the fragments we can sense work the same way: on their own, they tell only part of the story of our emotions.

that's where an approach that leans on images and movement as much as words, and that is integrative and systematic, may help. it may be able to reach parts of emotional experience that more traditional ways of thinking miss. that's something i hope to show over time.

in the posts ahead, i'll be sharing pieces of the system and how it works, along with my attempts to represent these dynamics visually. my sincere hope is that this helps people understand their own emotions a little better and explore how it relates to current theories of emotional regulation, healing strategies, and therapeutic practice.

about the visual

the movement isn't animated. descriptions of how feelings move, including my own, were translated into mathematical forces, and the visual is generated live from them. because it includes small random fluctuations, it doesn't repeat.

a map of how a feeling moves, not a picture of what it is.

posts

  1. what moves the river · the forces behind emotional dynamics